Case Study Banner

Motivating first year students using a level one 'fire-up' module.

 

Coventry University
School of Science and the Environment
Sir John Laing Building
Priory Street
Coventry
CV1 5FB

Contact: Martin Beck
Tel: 024 7688 8388
Email: m.beck@coventry.ac.uk

Martin Beck
  Curriculum Design, Content and Organisation.
 

"Courses are well designed to enable students to acquire an understanding of the construction industry context in which they will work" Q82/97 para9.

 

Aims:
This first year module aims to:

  • enthuse students about the construction industry and their potential role in its future;
  • make student aware of why they study the modules they do;
  • ensure students are aware of the relationship of modules and the integration of the many and varied professional roles within the construction industry;
  • expose students to a live construction project that they can follow from all stages including ground works through to practical completion;
  • gain an appreciation of the integrative nature of practical and professional roles in the construction industry and how each role is reliant upon the others;
  • enable staff to relate their teaching to the teaching of colleagues on other level-one modules;
  • allow staff to relate their teaching to a live situation for both practical and demonstration purposes.


Resources:
To run the module described in this case study requires:

  • a suitable construction site in a convenient location;
  • a willing Architect and Contractor;
  • full construction drawings and specification;
  • time to establish the site contacts;
  • time to take students, in small groups, for a site visit;
  • appropriate teaching materials.


Details:

Concern had been felt for a number of years by the staff teaching on the construction courses at Coventry University that students studying modular degree courses have a tendency to pigeon-hole their studies and fail to see the relationship between the modules they are studying. Because of this, their depth of understanding was often low. The students did not comprehend why they were having to study construction, mechanics, environmental, economics, planning, law, IT etc: often the view expressed was 'what relevance have these subjects to my discipline? - I just need what I need to do the job'. Students were failing to understand the inter-connections between the different subjects. Each module has a different lecturer and is frequently taught in a different building and faculty within the University and, because of the nature of modular programs, module leaders focus their attention on the learning outcomes of that particular module. Lecturing time is precious and no time was allowed/available for relating their work to that of other colleagues' modules from other disciplines.

The effect of all of these issues was that students' focus was sometimes very narrow; real appreciation of the diverse nature of the construction industry was never formed and students did not develop an enthusiasm for what they were studying or the desire to do well.

With these issues in mind the course development team considered how to address these problems. An opportunity for change arose with the quinquennial review of the building courses. The level-one 'fire-up' module was devised: the term 'fire-up' was chosen to state very clearly what the module was aiming to do, i.e. fire-up the students' enthusiasm for their studies. Students enrolling on one of the courses are required to purchase, and read, a book on the construction industry prior to attending the induction week program. This essential text (1) takes an integrative approach to the construction industry. The module then aims to demonstrate how various members of the building team integrate their work and relate to the total construction process and develops the students' understanding of the practical and professional relevance of their studies. It also addresses basic numerical, literacy, communication and I.T. skills.

Regular site visits ensure that students gain an appreciation of the progress and order in which a complex building is constructed. This enables them to see the construction of the foundations through to the detailed finishing stages. Students are able to ask questions about the process and who is responsible, from a professional point of view, for the various stages in the construction process. They can compare the theoretical drawing studio work of, say, a foundation detail to the real life situation of mud and seeming mess that is the reality of the construction site. Regular site visits demonstrate in the best way possible how a complex structure is put together and how each stage is dependant upon previous work if progress is to be smooth and to programme. Students gain an appreciation of the difficulty of programming a complex organisational matrix, as well as the practical difficulties of using limited site storage areas to maximum effect.

Large construction site
The site used for the 'fire-up' module.

The relationship of the site to taught subjects can be demonstrated in a number of modules:

  • Building Strength and Stability - mechanics coursework on assessing floor loading, reactions, bending moments and shear force, using the actual construction seen on drawing and on site visits;
  • Economics - relating economic principals to the construction site in lecturing;
  • Drawing studio - the drawing of construction details as seen on site visits;
  • Design and Construction - relating actual site conditions with the requirements of Health and Safety Legislation and design principals
  • Internal Environment -relating theory of light, heat and sound to the actual building being constructed;
  • Land and Building Surveying - practical surveying work relating to the setting out seen on site;
  • Planning - reference made to the site and the considerations the planners would apply to the site and proposed building;
  • Law - practical assessment of the various liabilities and duties of employer and employees, liabilities and remedies relating to public and private nuisance, identify duties to others in negligence and professional negligence.


Evaluation:

This module is in its first year of operation and no specific evaluation data is available. The module will be the focus of module questionnaires, which will cover the general issues and also will be subject to a specific questionnaire to ensure that the aims and objectives have been reasonably achieved. Staff will meet to discuss the module aims and objectives to see if they need revising, and also to discuss the problems and benefits of a module of this nature.


Benefits:
To the students:

  • they can see how their studies relate to the construction industry;
  • a regular site visit enables them to appreciate the complexities of the process and the reality of the construction site;
  • site visits give opportunities for questions and dialogue between staff and students, relating to a real project;
  • the students gain a better appreciation of the inter-related nature of the industry and they can see where the different professions affect the construction process, decisions and responsibilities;
  • they acquire a greater understanding of why individual modules are studied and how they relate to each other.


To the staff:

  • they have a live site to which they can relate when delivering their modules;
  • they have materials, (drawings and specification) to which they can refer and use in their teaching;
  • teaching material can be seen as relevant and up-to-date.


To the Institution:

  • valuable contacts are made with local industry and professional organisations facilitating, for example, help with industrial training placements and graduate employment.


Issues and lessons to be learnt:
There are a number of lessons to be learnt from developing this module which may prove difficult when replicating the module:

  • time spent and opportunity for finding a suitable local site;
  • not all contractors and professionals can be persuaded to help;
  • all staff must to be committed to using the site, and adjust, if necessary, their lecture and assessment strategies to suit.


Ongoing Developments:

A constant review of local construction sites in progress needs to take place to ensure that the principles adopted can be continued in the following academic year. Staff will need to constantly revise their material used in lectures and assessments as the site changes each year. The 'fire-up' module will require an annual review to ensure that the aims and objectives of the module can be met each year given the changing nature of the available site.


References, Further Reading and Sources of Further related information:

  1. Osborn D. (1999), Introduction to Building, 2nd Edition, Mitchells Series, Longmans, London.

home | search | projects | map | news | case studies | contacts | links