| |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
| Implementing an on-line learning environment within building courses. | ||
| Coventry University Contact: Keith Chapman |
![]() |
|
| Teaching, Learning & Assessment | ||
|
" There was evidence of innovation in teaching and learning methods, notably very effective computer-based learning ........" Q82/97 para18 |
||
Aims:
Resources: Notwithstanding this investment WebCT is no more than an 'empty box' into which teaching and learning materials have to be placed. The time investment in setting up the system and its ongoing maintenance is a significant factor for any institution considering any such similar investment in computer-aided learning technologies Details: A research assistant was employed in the Building subject group for one year to 'kick start' this initiative. This post was part funded by the University and part by a local building employers' educational charity. The research assistant was responsible for the School's WebCT implementation and, in addition, assisted academic staff to convert their existing teaching and learning materials into a relevant electronic format. His responsibilities further extended to mounting and maintaining these documents on the WebCT server. This was a temporary arrangement and it was envisaged that staff would eventually complete these activities themselves. As the RA's funding was temporary, it was important that staff acquired relevant skills in authoring and maintaining web-pages. Employing the RA enabled the School to make significant progress in providing the on-line environment in a short period of time. Staff in the School have a high workload and could not have managed to engage in all the activities necessary without this assistance. Although all first year modules (and many second year modules) have materials
on WebCT, the extent to which individual lecturers use the many and varied
learning and teaching opportunities offered by the environment varies.
Key drivers influencing uptake of the new technology have anecdotally
been identified as:
To encourage lecturers to adopt WebCT, various staff development activities have been organised. For example, meetings have been held to present samples of on-line resources to staff. These aim to encourage those without materials on WebCT and to raise their awareness of possible approaches and techniques adopted by their peers. Style
Implementation
WebCT also makes it possible for tutors to publish assessment grades for coursework to individual students. Students are able to review their own progress (all marks are subject to ratification by an Assessment Board)
Implementation Strategy
WebCT makes it possible for tutors to see how students have used the web pages. For example, a tutor can see how many times a particular student has accessed a specific page. This may be construed as a 'big brother' approach, but it is useful in alerting tutors to issues and problems. In addition, it highlights to the web-developer whether design strategies have been successful or not. One particular facility is the ability to set on-line tests. These are generally, but not necessarily, of a multi-choice format but have the advantage of immediate student feed-back and minimal marking effort on the part of the tutor. These tests can be one-off and summative or students can be given repeated access as part of formative learning.
A University wide strategy, driven by a Pro-Vice Chancellor, to use WebCT has been adopted. Although there is a centrally funded team that supports WebCT there is in fact minimal control and guidance from the University on how WebCT is to be implemented and used within any discipline area. In effect, staff make use of WebCT as they see fit. Each subject group is however required to report annually which modules have been implemented on WebCT. Although a strategic part of the University's teaching and learning strategy no formal quality assurance procedures have been implemented to date. Because of differing approaches used, and enthusiasm shown, by individual lecturers students don't always see the same 'level' and uniformity of information from module to module. Whereas there is probably a strong argument to be made for providing a degree of variety there is also a case to be made for some quality assurance of the materials provided. This has yet to be addressed. It is also important to recognise that WebCT is a supplementary teaching and learning medium. Within the building area it has not replaced traditional lectures, tutorials, seminars and practical classes but rather has supplemented these traditional approaches with new technologies that appeal to the learning needs of a modern generation of students. What can not be under-estimated however is the time and effort that is necessary to maintain this new learning environment. In an educational system where staff workloads are often measured in terms of staff contact hours there is an interesting debate to be had about how recognition is given to staff effort for developing and maintaining this new technology. Ongoing Developments: A further frustration was that staff, developing their module material, could not readily view it as a student would view it. The latest version of WebCT purchased by the University has now addressed this problem. All these improvements have facilitated the further take-up and ongoing use of WebCT.
|