Case Study Banner
Professional development through inter-disciplinary and inter-professional learning activities
 

Leeds Metropolitan University
School of the Built Environment
Brunswick Building,
Leeds
LS2 8BU

Contact:
David Pearce
Tel: 0113 2832 1703
Email: d.pearce@lmu.ac.uk

David Pearce
  Curriculum Design Content and Organisation
  "The [Leeds] programme is largely multi-disciplinary at Level 1, inter-disciplinary at level 2 and inter-professional at Level 3. Its modules incorporate multi-disciplinary and inter-professional......" Q202/98 para 11.
 

Aims:
The aims of the multi-disciplinary and inter-professional approach are to:

  • examine the roles of the key agencies and participants involved in the process of construction development;
  • provide an opportunity for students to work with students from other disciplines in the development of co-ordinated solutions to interdisciplinary problems;
  • allow students to explore some of the complex challenges which face built environment professionals;
  • develop teamwork, information technology skills and communication skills.


Resources
In project groups students work on existing or recent construction projects which encompass current issues that the industry faces. The projects selected are 'real' and varied so that each group has a different building and a different 'issue' to ensure that the modules have scope and depth.

building site and crane
Projects are based on 'real life' buildings.

Staff from all disciplines contribute to the modules which can at times lead to intensive staff workloads. To avoid this problem a high degree of staff co-ordination is required to allow resources to be used effectively.

Details
The rapidly changing world of commerce and the inter-disciplinary nature of complex design development problems have caused an increasing blurring of the boundaries between the professions. Built environment students therefore need to have a broad appreciation of the different roles and, more importantly, the common objectives. Such a requirement is implicit within initiatives such as the Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), as well as within the environmental challenges that face the construction industry.

Professional practice is therefore crucially about working with others in finding comprehensive solutions to complex problems. It is important therefore for the education process to provide the student with opportunities to develop the skills and abilities to contribute effectively within the modern workplace.

Such an emphasis on inter-disciplinary studies is an important characteristic of the modular scheme at Leeds. Inter-disciplinary studies have many facets - it is certainly not about simply mixing students on project work so as to mimic some aspect of current practice, i.e. designers sketch, quantity surveyors estimate cost, construction managers programme, engineers calculate sizes, planners provide strategies etc. Not only would this be of limited value, but an over-simplification of the roles that professionals actually undertake.

Inter-disciplinary working therefore has many facets including:

  • some common foundation of knowledge;
  • a proper understanding of individual roles;
  • a broad awareness of important issues facing the built environment;
  • collaborative practice;
  • an ability to contribute expertise effectively;
  • co-ordinated design and development solutions;
  • understanding of, and respect for, the expertise of other disciplines;
  • reflective practice;
  • comprehensive approaches to complex problems;
  • challenging current norms;
  • preparation for professional change.

This selection (not exhaustive) gives an indication of the breadth of the issues to be faced and the various levels of complexity within them. The means of achieving the above are also many and varied - some may require a mix of disciplines others may not.

The Leeds course scheme seeks to reflect the natural progression envisaged in the above selection - Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 skills, competencies and capabilities. The facets identified above are therefore incorporated within the Leeds courses in the following way.

Level 1 - a multi-disciplinary approach
A multi-disciplinary emphasis through shared learning of core knowledge alongside other disciplines is achieved through common modules. The broad appreciation of roles and issues in the built environment is a learning outcome of the 'Contemporary Issues in the Built Environment' module, which also introduces team working skills through group assignments.

Level 2 - an inter-disciplinary approach
Inter-disciplinary emphasis is provided through a module, which specifically aims to enable students to adopt some aspect(s) of their own discipline's traditional role. A project-based learning exercise is normally undertaken in Semester 2, by which time the students have a sufficient knowledge base to act in role. This provides a useful preparation for those students going on placement in the following year and is a valuable simulation exercise for full-time students.

Level 3 - an inter-professional approach
At final year level there is a need for a more profound appreciation of multi-faceted problems than simply performing in role allows. Many students have experienced a sandwich-training year and appropriate learning will centre around problems of a compound and complex nature, which reflect current challenges facing the built environment/construction industry. These include, for example, the PFI, the SRB, the Latham Report, the need for 4.5 million homes by 2020, energy accounting and many other environmental issues.

Therefore, at Leeds a common objective across the School is the intention that all modules at all levels should attempt to encourage students to recognise the importance of an inter-disciplinary ethos.


Evaluation:
The inter-disciplinary and inter-professional approach is considered to have had positive outcomes:

  • students are more aware of professional roles and recognise both their own responsibilities and that of other related professions more clearly;
  • the benefits of a team approach to professional working are emphasised;
  • an understanding of the complexities of the construction industry and the inter-dependence of construction disciplines will benefit students as they begin their professional careers.


Benefits:
The evaluation above identifies some of the benefits but the following observations are also notable:

  • cross-group working for both staff and students is perceived as very beneficial and wider cross- School learning activities are being encouraged;
  • inter-disciplinary and inter-professional studies are considered to be the flagship elements of the combined Built Environment programme.


Issues and lessons to be learnt:
All modules have to be adequately resourced. Across-School multi-discipline group work demands high levels of co-ordination and this is not always easily achieved. The Level 1 module runs in Semester 1 but it has been observed that mixing students from different courses when they have yet to familiarise themselves with their own subject colleagues can have a negative effect and can result in poor participation rates. To address this problem Level 1 groups are now formed from students within a single discipline.

It is not always possible to achieve an equal balance of student numbers due to differing group sizes and the mix of professional roles required. Occasionally some students have to work outside of their own discipline role and this can result in student concern and some student de-motivation.


Ongoing Developments:
There has been a continuing broadening of the type of projects considered suitable to develop students' understanding of different types of construction work and the diverse nature of the built environment. At Level 3 the issues raised have become more complex and now include social dimensions: the intention being to allow students to be challenged by the task and make it more demanding.

One member of staff now co-ordinates this activity across all three levels of the programme and staff from each professional group now usually work on all, or several levels, of the programme.

References, Further Reading and Sources of Further related information:

  1. Latham, M.(1994) Constructing the Team, Department of the Environment, HMSO,
  2. For the Egan Report Rethinking Construction see:
    http://www.m4i.org.uk/m4i

home | search | projects | map | news | case studies | contacts | links